Async Video comparison

Loom vs Vidyard

An independent, side-by-side comparison to help you pick the right tool. Pricing, features, strengths, and trade-offs.

Loom logo
Loom

Free (25 videos) / Business $15/user/mo / Enterprise custom

$203M total (acquired by Atlassian for $975M)

Vidyard logo
Vidyard

Free / Pro $29/mo / Business custom

$85M total

User ratings

Loom logo

4.7/5

on G2 (2344 reviews)

85% satisfaction

Vidyard logo

4.5/5

on G2 (780 reviews)

79% satisfaction

Source: G2.com. Ratings may change over time.

At a glance

Loom Vidyard
Pricing Free (25 videos) / Business $15/user/mo / Enterprise custom Free / Pro $29/mo / Business custom
Type Async Video Async Video
G2 Rating 4.7/5 (2344 reviews) 4.5/5 (780 reviews)
Team Size 251-500 251-500
Funding $203M total (acquired by Atlassian for $975M) $85M total
Key Investors Andreessen Horowitz, Sequoia Capital, Kleiner Perkins

Feature comparison

Feature Loom Vidyard
Screen and camera recording
AI summaries and chapters
Viewer engagement analytics
Comments and reactions
Atlassian integration
Video prospecting for sales
Viewer tracking and analytics
Video-in-email
CRM integration
Video hosting and management

What makes each tool different

Loom logo

Loom

Loom created the async video category and remains the dominant player. Acquired by Atlassian, it integrates deeply with Jira, Confluence, and the broader Atlassian ecosystem. AI features now auto-generate titles, summaries, and chapters.

Vidyard logo

Vidyard

Vidyard targets sales teams with video prospecting features. Its video-in-email capability, viewer tracking, and CRM integrations let sales reps send personalized video messages and see exactly who watched and for how long.

Strengths and weaknesses

Loom logo
Loom

Strengths

  • Category leader with massive adoption
  • AI features add real value
  • Atlassian ecosystem integration

Weaknesses

  • Free tier now limited to 25 videos
  • Per-user pricing adds up for teams
  • Owned by Atlassian, less independent innovation
Vidyard logo
Vidyard

Strengths

  • Best for sales video prospecting
  • Detailed viewer engagement data
  • Good CRM integrations

Weaknesses

  • Less suited for internal async communication
  • Paid plans needed for key features
  • Video hosting adds cost for large libraries

Try both and decide

The best way to choose is to test each tool with your own workflow. Most offer free tiers or trials.