Productivity comparison

Loom vs Yac

An independent, side-by-side comparison to help you pick the right tool. Pricing, features, strengths, and trade-offs.

Loom logo
Loom

Free (25 videos) / Business $15/user/mo / Enterprise custom

$203M total (acquired by Atlassian for $975M)

Yac logo
Yac

Free / Premium $5/user/mo

User ratings

Loom logo

4.7/5

on G2 (2344 reviews)

85% satisfaction

Yac logo

Not yet rated on G2

Source: G2.com. Ratings may change over time.

At a glance

Loom Yac
Pricing Free (25 videos) / Business $15/user/mo / Enterprise custom Free / Premium $5/user/mo
Type Productivity Productivity
G2 Rating 4.7/5 (2344 reviews)
Team Size 251-500
Funding $203M total (acquired by Atlassian for $975M)
Key Investors Andreessen Horowitz, Sequoia Capital, Kleiner Perkins

Feature comparison

Feature Loom Yac
Screen and camera recording
AI summaries and chapters
Viewer engagement analytics
Comments and reactions
Atlassian integration
Async voice messages
Screen sharing with voice
Threaded conversations
Transcription
Integration with Slack and Teams

What makes each tool different

Loom logo

Loom

Loom created the async video category and remains the dominant player. Acquired by Atlassian, it integrates deeply with Jira, Confluence, and the broader Atlassian ecosystem. AI features now auto-generate titles, summaries, and chapters.

Yac logo

Yac

Yac focuses specifically on voice messages as a meeting replacement. Instead of scheduling a call for a quick question, send a Yac. It is faster than typing, more nuanced than text, and does not require synchronous availability.

Strengths and weaknesses

Loom logo
Loom

Strengths

  • Category leader with massive adoption
  • AI features add real value
  • Atlassian ecosystem integration

Weaknesses

  • Free tier now limited to 25 videos
  • Per-user pricing adds up for teams
  • Owned by Atlassian, less independent innovation
Yac logo
Yac

Strengths

  • Voice is faster than typing for many updates
  • No scheduling needed
  • Lightweight and focused

Weaknesses

  • Niche use case
  • Requires cultural shift to voice messaging
  • Small team, product future uncertain

Try both and decide

The best way to choose is to test each tool with your own workflow. Most offer free tiers or trials.