Async Video comparison

Loom vs Tella

An independent, side-by-side comparison to help you pick the right tool. Pricing, features, strengths, and trade-offs.

Loom logo
Loom

Free (25 videos) / Business $15/user/mo / Enterprise custom

$203M total (acquired by Atlassian for $975M)

Tella logo
Tella

Free / Pro $15/mo / Team $25/mo

User ratings

Loom logo

4.7/5

on G2 (2344 reviews)

85% satisfaction

Tella logo

Not yet rated on G2

Source: G2.com. Ratings may change over time.

At a glance

Loom Tella
Pricing Free (25 videos) / Business $15/user/mo / Enterprise custom Free / Pro $15/mo / Team $25/mo
Type Async Video Async Video
G2 Rating 4.7/5 (2344 reviews)
Team Size 251-500
Funding $203M total (acquired by Atlassian for $975M)
Key Investors Andreessen Horowitz, Sequoia Capital, Kleiner Perkins

Feature comparison

Feature Loom Tella
Screen and camera recording
AI summaries and chapters
Viewer engagement analytics
Comments and reactions
Atlassian integration
Built-in video editor
Canvas-based layout
Zoom and pan effects
Custom backgrounds and branding

What makes each tool different

Loom logo

Loom

Loom created the async video category and remains the dominant player. Acquired by Atlassian, it integrates deeply with Jira, Confluence, and the broader Atlassian ecosystem. AI features now auto-generate titles, summaries, and chapters.

Tella logo

Tella

Tella combines recording with a real editing experience. Its canvas-based editor lets you add multiple recordings, zoom effects, and backgrounds to create polished videos without external editing tools.

Strengths and weaknesses

Loom logo
Loom

Strengths

  • Category leader with massive adoption
  • AI features add real value
  • Atlassian ecosystem integration

Weaknesses

  • Free tier now limited to 25 videos
  • Per-user pricing adds up for teams
  • Owned by Atlassian, less independent innovation
Tella logo
Tella

Strengths

  • Best built-in editing for screen recordings
  • Professional-looking output
  • Good for product demos and tutorials

Weaknesses

  • More time-consuming than quick Loom-style recordings
  • Smaller user base
  • Limited viewer analytics

Try both and decide

The best way to choose is to test each tool with your own workflow. Most offer free tiers or trials.