Recall.ai vs MeetingBaaS
An independent, side-by-side comparison to help you pick the right tool. Pricing, features, strengths, and trade-offs.
$0.65/hr all-in ($0.50 + $0.15) / $0.25/hr startup / Custom
Founded 2022
San Francisco, CA
$50.7M
Free tier / Pro $99/mo / Scale $199/mo / Enterprise $299/mo + usage tokens
Founded 2023
Neuilly-sur-Seine, France
Bootstrapped
User ratings
4.5/5
on G2 (1 reviews)
100% satisfaction
Not yet rated on G2
Source: G2.com. Ratings may change over time.
At a glance
| Recall.ai | MeetingBaaS | |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | $0.65/hr all-in ($0.50 + $0.15) / $0.25/hr startup / Custom | Free tier / Pro $99/mo / Scale $199/mo / Enterprise $299/mo + usage tokens |
| Type | Recording API | Recording API |
| G2 Rating | 4.5/5 (1 reviews) | n/a |
| Team Size | 11-50 | Open source / Small team |
| Founded | 2022 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | Neuilly-sur-Seine, France |
| Funding | $50.7M | Bootstrapped |
| Key Investors | Bessemer Venture Partners, HubSpot Ventures, Salesforce Ventures, Ridge Ventures, Y Combinator, RTP Global | n/a |
| Bot Join Time | Under 10 seconds | n/a |
| Diarization | Separate audio streams per speaker | n/a |
Platform coverage
Compliance and security
Feature comparison
| Feature | Recall.ai | MeetingBaaS |
|---|---|---|
| Meeting bot API (6 platforms) | No | |
| Real-time audio/video streaming (WebSocket) | No | |
| Desktop Recording SDK (no visible bot) | No | |
| Interactive agents (speak, display in meetings) | No | |
| Per-participant audio streams for speaker separation | No | |
| Calendar Integration API (free) | No | |
| Built-in transcription ($0.15/hr) | No | |
| SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR compliant | No | |
| US, EU, JP data residency | No | |
| Open-source bot infrastructure | No | |
| Self-hosted or managed options | No | |
| Multi-platform bot support (Zoom, Meet, Teams) | No | |
| Webhook-based API | No | |
| Transcription via Gladia or BYO | No | |
| Calendar integration for auto-join | No | |
| Real-time WebSocket transcription | No | |
| SDKs in 8 languages (Node, Python, Go, Rust, Ruby, PHP, Java, .NET) | No |
What makes each tool different
Recall.ai
Recall.ai is the leading meeting bot infrastructure provider, processing, in the words of its own engineering blog, terabytes per second of real-time media across many thousands of cloud instances. Over 3,000 companies use it, including HubSpot, ClickUp, Monday.com, and Instacart. They also offer a Desktop Recording SDK for botless capture and interactive agents that can speak inside meetings.
MeetingBaaS
MeetingBaaS is an open-source alternative to Recall.ai. You can self-host the bot infrastructure or use their hosted service. The open-source model gives developers full control and transparency over the meeting bot pipeline. 50+ companies use it, with SDKs in 8 languages.
Strengths and weaknesses
Strengths
- Widest platform coverage (6 platforms + desktop SDK)
- 3,000+ customers, proven at scale
- Separate audio stream per participant, so speaker identity comes from the stream rather than from model inference
- Interactive agents can act inside meetings
- SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR with BAA available
Weaknesses
- $0.50/hr adds up at high volume; volume discounts exist but Recall.ai does not publish the rates, saying startup and enterprise discounts differ too much to list
- Storage is sold in 30-day units with no published annual rate
- No official language SDKs (REST API only)
- Bot approach faces platform restrictions (Teams blocking)
Strengths
- Open source gives full transparency (216+ GitHub stars)
- Self-hosting option for privacy-sensitive use
- Competitive pricing (~$0.35-0.50/hr)
- Free tier with 75 bots/day
- SDKs in 8 languages
Weaknesses
- Self-hosting requires DevOps investment
- Newer and less battle-tested than Recall.ai
- Smaller team and community
- 3 platforms vs Recall.ai's 6
Try both and decide
The best way to choose is to test each tool with your own workflow. Most offer free tiers or trials.